Earlier this week--in between chatting the battle of bad words and Bush getting his groove on--I told marketers that saving the world rests in their your hands. Now that's a pretty TALL order from one small marketer. And blogging tools make it all too easy for me to wax poetic on the fate of the world.
Yet, as I said in that post, I don't think the world revolves around marketing (or marketers). But I am convinced marketing drives many of the world's decisions.
In that post I was speaking specifically to green initiatives and how I'm certain that, in order to get people to be environmentally responsible, we need to make green practices and products a 'cool' experience that people want to align with--instead of one they feel they have to abide by. Because the guilt play doesn't work. We have enough to feel guilty about (yawn).
Then, luck be a lady (!) another worldly example came my way today. First I'll give you the background and then I'll wax poetic. My colleague and dear friend Neil Vineberg was at The Tribeca Film Festival yesterday. Neil saw Angelina Jolie's new film, A Place in Time, a documentary that, according to Neil, "captures the commonality of the human spirit by filming in many places around the world at the same moment."
The film includes many of Angelina's fellow celebrity friends in places all around the globe like, Colin Farrell (Italy), Jude Law (New Orleans, LA) as well as Neil's friend Natabara Rollosson in China. So being that Neil went to the film with one of the film's participants he had the chance to speak in-depth with Jolie about helping her promote the extreme poverty effort. Neil has a track-record of creating and promoting global peace initiatives (his every-continent Peace Run has been applauded by the United Nations and his latest effort was a peace initiative for the Middle East).
What struck me about Neil's experience? No, it's not that he met Angelina Jolie. It's the strategy he details, of which I'll excerpt a part of his post here: "Why is a film like this needed? Simple. We need to educate children of developed nations who will be the leaders of tomorrow that the global community is also their community. Problems in one part of the global neighborhood are also theirs to solve."
I really like his messaging of "global neighborhood." That word brings us closer because it makes us neighbors. Neighbors have something in common since they share the same territory. One commonality that every single person on this earth shares is the same territory. Face it, we're a heck of a lot more neighborly with Sri Lanka and Nigeria than, say, Saturn or Neptune.
And that got me thinking. We take creative ideas and turn them into BIG, billion-dollar realities everyday (just look at the stock exchange--those all started as ideas). So it stands to reason that we can solve some BIG realities by way of creative ideas. Since we improve businesses by marketing them to the globe it seems logical that we can improve the globe by marketing it to businesses. In other words, in our quest to "go global," what if we were to take ownership of not only the world's markets...but also the world's problems?
Yeah, that problem just seems too big (and too much to own).
Much like global warming seems too big (and too much to solve).
But global warming isn't too big to solve when we get more people to own the problem. And how do we do that? By creating incentives for people to want to align themselves with green initiatives (the solution). Because by aligning with green initiatives they're owning the problem...they're just owning it in a positive fashion instead of this death and glacial-destruction messaging. People don't relate to glaciers. They do relate to cool green stuff that other cool people (not glaciers) also relate to.
Now businesses don't relate to the world's problems.
But they do relate to the revenue potential of the world's markets.
Obviously that revenue opportunity seems very long-term and far away right now. But so did the markets of China and India a mere ten-to-fifteen years ago. Heck, so did America some 230+ years ago. Granted our forefathers were fueled by some mighty strong anger when they invested in this market many of us now call home. But it wasn't the anger that sustained them, it was their relentless focus on creating something better: simply stated, they took ownership of their common problem, brainstormed their ideas, created a solution...and got others to align with their efforts (or own the the problem) by way of incentivizing them. The incentives in this case were the "ideas" of freedom, less taxes, more land, etc.
They sure were some great marketers, eh? And that Constitution is arguably the most successful piece of marketing collateral ever written, save maybe the Bible. Both pieces have spread--and continue to spread--important ideas (and yeah, both of them have gone viral).
So just like incentivizing consumers to adopt green initiatives we need to incentivize business and government to invest in underdeveloped markets. What more positive incentive exists than a revenue opportunity? A short-term revenue opportunity, actually. Hmm, I can't help there. But businesses and government sure like to take credit for things...how about taking credit for the creation of new markets or saving the world? That's sure to land press and increase brand equity.
Many argue these regions don't have natural resources worth investing in. Well they sure have a lot of people. If those markets are bolstered, one day those people can buy a lot of soda and sneakers. Others argue that we need to invest more money locally than abroad. I understand that too. All the more reason for businesses (vs. government) to make the bulk of the investment in developing these regions.
About ten years ago I was griping to my friend in saying, "It's just a not-my-problem world." But what if we were to make the world our problem? When it becomes our problem we're focused on solutions--and marketers are especially good at identifying solutions and creating incentives. At the very least it's worth a couple posts and some conversation, eh? Sorry that was long, folks...it's a rather big problem.